Marlin Firearms Forum banner

16" vs 20" barrel on 1894c

3.9K views 15 replies 8 participants last post by  AccuRat  
#1 ·
I am considering cutting my 20" barrel 1894c to 16 1/4". I chopped my 336 to 16+" and REALLY like the portability/balance/handling. Does anyone have experience with doing this modification with a 357 magnum? I know accuracy is increased when the barrel is shortened (stiffer platform I guess) but when using 158 gr JSP loads...is there really that much effective practical loss in 4" less barrel length? I know about the potential muzzle signature and increase in loudness...neither which concerns me; just terminal effectiveness within the optimal usefulness of the 357 mag round...less than 150 yards.
 
#2 ·
I have an opinion that 357 ammo is designed for revolver and should hit whatever velocity peak before 12 inches. The real answer would be someone here with good chronograph experience, the ammo and time could sort this out with much more than an opinion. Perhaps someone can point to a print or online exam of the question with chrono evidence. This forum likely has the right person(s) for the data and study.
 
#3 ·
Lucky,

some reloading manuals have data for both pistol and rifle. Maybe checking out some online info by Hodgdon might help you out.

I have .45 Colt calibers in pistols (Ruger Super Blackhawk Hunter) and a Marlin Limited in 16.25" and Cowboy in 20".

Without having some actual data in from of me, I know that your POWDER selections help determine velocity peaks within certain barrel lengths.

You may be correct in that the 16+ inchers just might supply you alittle more 'Umph', especially if you use some good slow burning powders like H110, 2400, AA9 and LilGun.

I'll be interesting in seeing what someone post here that actually has some good data with the .357 on these various barrel lengths.


..........Widder
 
#4 ·
Widowmaker...forgot to mention in my original post; All of my hunting ammo is with factory loads (Winchester 158 gr JSP) or similar by other brands....I am not reloading right now. Even my practice ammo (38 special 158 gr SWC) is factory. Some years ago I got a great deal on bulk factory ammo and I'll be using that supply for awhile yet.
 
#5 ·
I thought the 1894c's had 18" barrels...?
18.5" actually. The only 20" 1894 in 357 was the octagon Cowboy. Marlin has also done 357 Mag 1894s in 24" and 16". But the C has always been a 18.5".

I've got my best results in 357 rifles using slower burning powders like 2400 & H110 out of a 24" barrel.
 
#8 ·
You're right Willy...mine is the basic 1894c so it should be 18.5", I guess I was thinking about my 336 when I wrote 20"! I think that ballistic chart will help me decide what I should do, thanks ddc.
 
#10 ·
Good point Willy...in looking at the chart, it looks like it wouldn't effect the velocity, but the expense of the modification compared to only the 2" i would be removing doesn't make worth while to me. Thanks everyone for your comments.
 
#11 ·
some of the things we do in our modifications aren't really 'wise' if we look at it from a money vs. performance aspect.

some of us, especially ME, do it for cosmetic purposes.....because we just want to.

Kinda like buying a Ruger MKIII .22 pistol and sending it off to Volquartsen just to have another barrel put on it.....because it looks good..... :)


..........Widder
 
#12 ·
Based on the data from BBTI I can safely say the the 357 magnum in most commercial loads reaches maximum velocity at about 16" to 17" so cutting the barrel down to 16 1/4" will not cost you anything in muzzle velocity. You will have to shorten the magazine so you'll give up at least one round of magazine capacity. You may have to get a different barrel band too.
 
#16 ·
Im with widow....my CS at 18.5" is ok, but my '81 vintage 1894 .44 seems slightly long. Im mulling a barrel chop to 16.5" just for the handy factor....and cause it looks cool. :) I figure whatever velocity i may lose by cutting 3.5" is more than made up for by that gained by the cartridge in a 16.5" barrel (vice any handgun-length barrel).