Marlin Firearms Forum banner

Ruger GP100 .44 Special

6.8K views 35 replies 18 participants last post by  BubbaJon  
#1 ·
Recently picked up this discontinued GP100 in .44 Special with the 3" barrel and 5-shot cylinder on another gun forum. Total cost was $750 with shipping and FFL transfer which seemed like a good deal considering it came with a set of fancy wood insert grips along with the original Hogue monogrip. Overall the gun shows little use and is built like a tank with a smooth double-action trigger pull. I have loaded .44 Magnum for many years but have never loaded .44 Special so also bought 400 pieces of Starline brass with a want ad on yet another forum. Otherwise I am stocked with plenty of jacketed and cast bullets, etc. Looking forward to working up some loads and shooting this gun at the range...
Image

Image

Image

Image
 
#4 ·
Dang, they do exist! Nice snag, John, I've been in the search for a few years and have yet to find one. You give me hope, though. It appears to be nearly an NIB, I'd say you got a deal.

Looking forward to a report on your loads and how it shoots them.

Jack
 
#5 ·
Great looking revolver and built h e ll for stout! I've got a S&W 696 3" 44 special and a first year Charter Arms Bulldog (3" 44 special), and neither are built as strong as those GP100s are. Great find and great price I think. Congratulations!
 
#6 ·
I have the same revolver--bought back in early 2017 shortly after they came out. I shoot full-up 240 gr hard cast/800-X loads through mine. I feel that the frame could handle +P loads but since the forcing cone is so thin---I keep my loads to book max levels. I really like my Ruger and I am sure you will too!
 
#11 ·
I have the blued steel 5" version of this gun, it is a pleasure to carry, very accurate but a real handful for my 75 year old joints if heavy bullets and loads are used. With heavy loads the recoil approaches that of 44 Mags due to its light weight. I too keep my loads on the lighter side and it is then a pleasure to shoot. I completely agree with the comment about the thin forcing cone. Ruger says it is strong enough but time will tell. My Bisselly Blackhawk 44 special has a forcing cone that is far thicker than that on the GP100.
 
#8 ·
Neat revolver that I haven't seen before. I love .44 Special but also .44 Magnum, so, anything that I have or get will shoot both! I have always enjoyed the heavy recoil of .357 and .44 Magnum rounds and have shot them with precision because I can handle it and I'm somewhat stupid for NOT flinching with this massive explosion in front of my face!! Practice, practice, practice...

Enjoy!
 
#10 ·
Very nice! It's my favorite handgun cartridge. How would you compare it to a vintage S&W? I mean trigger pull, and how it feels in the hand. I currently have a pre 24 and a 624-3 both with 6" barrels.
 

Attachments

#25 ·
I have one of these GP100 .44Spl. revolvers. I LOVE it. It is very accurate and the trigger is great. I am a dyed in the wool S&W fan, but with the introduction of the GP100 Match Champion, Ruger finally showed they could make a great DA/SA trigger. I believe that has trickled down to other GP100s.

After I bought bought the Match Champion, and saw the ad for the .44Spl, I looked at one and liked the feel, but it was the trigger that sold me. It is extremely accurate with Hornady Critical Defense rounds. I then decided to pick up a Talo GP-100 in 2.5" .357 with a gold bead front sight, and it too was a great trigger. All 3 are light years better than earlier GP100 revolver triggers.

The 44Spl. GP100 is now up along side my pre-lock S&W 686 .357 with 2.5" barrel and S&W 629 Mountain Gun in .44 Magnum as favorite DA revolvers. I am considering adding a Lipsey's Ruger Stainless Bisley Blackhawk in .44Sp. I like the caliber, but finding factory ammo lately, that is not Cowboy ammo, has been hit or miss.
 
#12 ·
The S&W 696 was known for its very thin forcing cone and there were apparently some issues with it cracking when using hot loads. I haven't handled the Ruger but I figure their forcing cone would be much stouter. The new S&W 69 was redesigned and no longer has the problem.
 
#13 ·
I do hope that you are correct and that there is no problem. I haven't handled a S&W 696 with the earlier forcing cone so I can not comment on how it compared to the GP100. It is my understanding that both the GP100 and 44 SPL. Bisely Blackhawk are built on 357 frames, someone please correct me if I am wrong. If I am correct it appears strange to me that there would be such a difference in the forcing cone thickness. I haven't taken any measurements and calculated the difference yet, although I may do so, but it appears that the Blackhawk is more than double the GP100.
 
#17 ·
My Ruger Blackhawk 44 SPL and 1927 S&W N frame Third Model Hand Ejector 44 SPL can handle the 1,000-1,100 FPS MV +P loads. I use those loads in my deer hunting back-up revolvers due to the black bears that wander the area. Those pistols also like the Skeeter load (handed down from Elmer Keith) as well. If the GP100 had a thicker forcing cone, I think it could handle those +P loads too.
 
#18 ·
My Ruger Blackhawk 44 SPL and 1927 S&W N frame Third Model Hand Ejector 44 SPL can handle the 1,000-1,100 FPS MV +P loads. I use those loads in my deer hunting back-up revolvers due to the black bears that wander the area. Those pistols also like the Skeeter load (handed down from Elmer Keith) as well. If the GP100 had a thicker forcing cone, I think it could handle those loads too.
My Ruger Blackhawk 44 SPL and 1927 S&W N frame Third Model Hand Ejector 44 SPL can handle the 1,000-1,100 FPS MV +P loads. I use those loads in my deer hunting back-up revolvers due to the black bears that wander the area. Those pistols also like the Skeeter load (handed down from Elmer Keith) as well. If the GP100 had a thicker forcing cone, I think it could handle those loads too.
I agree. No doubt it could handle such loads, but the recoil would be a different matter.
 
#22 ·
Definitely good info, thanks for all the input. I own a few 44 magnums so I have no plans to hot-rod this one. I'm thinking of working up a couple of loads, one for plinking using Trail Boss and another medium-level load for real business with either Unique or 2400. I have read reports of cracked forcing cones in this model so will probably not try the Skeeter load in this one.
 
#24 ·
Thanks, I think you are on the right track. I do enjoy my GP100 but I try to keep in mind what it is best suited for. I have saw it written that Bill Ruger refused to chamber for the 44 Spl. in his lifetime because he thought folks would just try to turn it into a 44 mag. I think there is wisdom in that. Good for us that Keith did not see it that way however.
 
#28 ·
I too have a Ruger GP100 in .44 Special and absolutely love it. I have big hands and switched out the grips and also installed custom made elk antler grip inserts.
Image
 
#34 ·
You are correct Sir!


I've been shooting and enjoying this one since July of 2020. 5" barrel, blued steel, walnut grips AND in .44 Special - what's not to like! She likes cast bullets as well as plated and really shines with Lyman #429421 pushed with Unique powder.
It's kind'a like Mikey said - "Try it - you'll like it!" LOL!

WYT-P
Skyhunter
 
#35 ·
I own one .44 special. It’s the Rossi 720 made in the “90s” now discontinued. It heavier than a charterarms but lighter than Ruger or Smith. I rarely see it referred to in the discussions. I use modest loads of various pistol powder. I.e. unique, etc. it’s probably close to a standard .45acp.