Marlin Firearms Forum banner

Just posted my review of the new Marlin 336 Trapper

11K views 49 replies 23 participants last post by  Redthies  
#1 · (Edited)
Here is the link to read the review.

Image
 
#3 · (Edited)
Nice review. And the 1/11 twist makes sense with the shorter barrel to make sure there is a enough spin on the bullet. And at $1500 I am one of those who will "balk". Even though a very nice gun that sounds well made I can afford it it but can't justify the cost. And a barrel just 4" shorter doesn't do much for me. I would much rather have the 20" version. But I am certain some will think this is the best thing since sliced bread.

I am glad to see Ruger cranking out guns. My goal is to get a new 44 mag with the 1/20 twist. I have 3 different ones on my GB watch list. They are priced around $900 for NIB rifles.
 
#4 ·
Nice review. And the 1/11 twist makes sense with the shorter barrel to make sure there is a enough spin on the bullet. And at $1500 I am one of those who will "balk". even though a very nice gun that sounds well made I can afford it it but can't justify the cost. And a barrel just 4" shorter doesn't do much for me. I would much rather have the 20" version. But I am certain some will think this is the best thing since sliced bread.

I am glad to see Ruger cranking out guns. My goal is to get a new 44 mag with the 1/20 twist. I have 3 different ones on my GB watch list. They are priced around $900 for NIB rifles.
I'm in the middle of testing a new 1894 SBL, .44 mag and I like it. I really liked the earlier classic .44 mag that I tested however this one I'll probably buy. Really like it.
 
#5 ·
Sounds good. Laminated stocks and long scope rails with big loop levers leave me scratching my head and asking why? But at least there is variety for those that like those features. And whatever it takes to keep up the interest in lever actions I am all for. There is nothing better than a good lever action in your hands.

I have bolts, single shots and semi autos but my most handled and admired rifles are my lever actions. You just can't have enough of them.
 
#11 · (Edited)
Downbeach I totally agree. I would love a 360Buckhammer.

Boy wouldn't that be great! I really hope that round takes off. I would like a bigger than 30 caliber but not all the way up to 444 or 45-70.
 
#13 · (Edited)
One thing about the 360Buckhammer I have wondered about is if that round is a Henry exclusive and no one else can chamber a rifle in that round. After I bought my Rossi R-95 I sent Rossi and email and suggested they chamber some rifles in that round and their response makes me think it won't ever happen.
 
#32 ·
Because realistically, it does. Ruger would sell maybe one in .35 for every 20 in .30-30 Win. It’s not “fair”, but it’s reality. They may do one eventually as a distributor exclusive though, so there is hope. I’d honestly be surprised if they everdo the .35 in regular production.
 
#28 ·
I think Marlin did a great job on this rifle by modernizing it to better withstand inclement weather when hunting especially in the northeast like I do. Things will always change and as a business if you don't change you get left behind. I'm glad a company like Ruger is manufacturing great Marlin rifles and as far as prices go, everything has gone up in price due to the price increases of supplies. My rifles were 1/3 of todays prices but so was everything else at that time.
 
#31 ·
I'm in the middle of testing a new 1894 SBL, .44 mag and I like it. I really liked the earlier classic .44 mag that I tested however this one I'll probably buy. Really like it.
Are you getting the test guns directly from Ruger? If you are, could you suggest they do a Marauder type version? I far prefer the straight stocks. I handled a .45-70 Trapper last week and found it to be very heavy for such a short gun. I think a lot of that is the laminate stocks. It was smoother in the action than the 1894 I tried.

They are great rifles no doubt, but that stupid big loop has to go.
That “stupid” big loop is the only way I’d buy one. Try shooting those ridiculous looking reverse curve “regular“ loops with big hands, let alone with gloves. Some of us hunt with these guns, and live where hunting occurs in weather below freezing. Not having a big loop is a deal breaker. Now, you can take the joke a bit too far like the huge ones you can push a bowling ball through from Rossi or Chiappa.
 
#35 ·
Are you getting the test guns directly from Ruger? If you are, could you suggest they do a Marauder type version? I far prefer the straight stocks. I handled a .45-70 Trapper last week and found it to be very heavy for such a short gun. I think a lot of that is the laminate stocks. It was smoother in the action than the 1894 I tried.



That “stupid” big loop is the only way I’d buy one. Try shooting those ridiculous looking reverse curve “regular“ loops with big hands, let alone with gloves. Some of us hunt with these guns, and live where hunting occurs in weather below freezing. Not having a big loop is a deal breaker. Now, you can take the joke a bit too far like the huge ones you can push a bowling ball through from Rossi or Chiappa.
Yes, I deal directly with the Mayodan, NC Ruger team. What a bunch of professionals! I'll mention it however I'll say this, they have a looooong list of rifles they're working on from design concept to prototypes, etc. I can't wait for each and every new rifle they drop! I too prefer the big loop lever....