I'm in the middle of testing a new 1894 SBL, .44 mag and I like it. I really liked the earlier classic .44 mag that I tested however this one I'll probably buy. Really like it.Nice review. And the 1/11 twist makes sense with the shorter barrel to make sure there is a enough spin on the bullet. And at $1500 I am one of those who will "balk". even though a very nice gun that sounds well made I can afford it it but can't justify the cost. And a barrel just 4" shorter doesn't do much for me. I would much rather have the 20" version. But I am certain some will think this is the best thing since sliced bread.
I am glad to see Ruger cranking out guns. My goal is to get a new 44 mag with the 1/20 twist. I have 3 different ones on my GB watch list. They are priced around $900 for NIB rifles.
Are you getting the test guns directly from Ruger? If you are, could you suggest they do a Marauder type version? I far prefer the straight stocks. I handled a .45-70 Trapper last week and found it to be very heavy for such a short gun. I think a lot of that is the laminate stocks. It was smoother in the action than the 1894 I tried.I'm in the middle of testing a new 1894 SBL, .44 mag and I like it. I really liked the earlier classic .44 mag that I tested however this one I'll probably buy. Really like it.
That “stupid” big loop is the only way I’d buy one. Try shooting those ridiculous looking reverse curve “regular“ loops with big hands, let alone with gloves. Some of us hunt with these guns, and live where hunting occurs in weather below freezing. Not having a big loop is a deal breaker. Now, you can take the joke a bit too far like the huge ones you can push a bowling ball through from Rossi or Chiappa.They are great rifles no doubt, but that stupid big loop has to go.
Yes, I deal directly with the Mayodan, NC Ruger team. What a bunch of professionals! I'll mention it however I'll say this, they have a looooong list of rifles they're working on from design concept to prototypes, etc. I can't wait for each and every new rifle they drop! I too prefer the big loop lever....Are you getting the test guns directly from Ruger? If you are, could you suggest they do a Marauder type version? I far prefer the straight stocks. I handled a .45-70 Trapper last week and found it to be very heavy for such a short gun. I think a lot of that is the laminate stocks. It was smoother in the action than the 1894 I tried.
That “stupid” big loop is the only way I’d buy one. Try shooting those ridiculous looking reverse curve “regular“ loops with big hands, let alone with gloves. Some of us hunt with these guns, and live where hunting occurs in weather below freezing. Not having a big loop is a deal breaker. Now, you can take the joke a bit too far like the huge ones you can push a bowling ball through from Rossi or Chiappa.