Marlin Firearms Forum banner

Friday Night Gun Fight: Marlin X7 vs. Savage 110 ..From F&S

5.1K views 13 replies 14 participants last post by  farnerfred  
#1 ·
January 10, 2014
Gunfight Friday: Battle of the Budget Rifles


By Phil Bourjaily
Image

Times are still tough, so today’s battle is between two rifles that didn’t cost much. Both have given faithful service and will deliver a bullet to the right place at the right time. One is a .308, the other, a .270. The Marlin X7 is the short-action version of the XL 7, Marlin’s bolt action that comes with its version of the Savage Accu-trigger. Dave has called it, in print and without a trace of hyperbole, “The best working gun, for the least money, in the history of Western Man.” The Savage 110 is another inexpensive rifle that earns Dave’s seal of approval. When Savage was going under back in the ’80s, CEO Ron Coburn took over, eliminated every gun in the line except the 110, and rebuilt the company’s reputation around the affordable, accurate bolt-action 110.
Mickey Rountree’s Marlin X7
Image

This is my Marlin X7 in .308. This was made in the original Marlin factory before Remington acquired Marlin. I have made one change to it by switching the black synthetic stock for a camo one I purchased from Marlin. These guns are underrated tack-drivers and can be had for a little over $300. I have topped it with a Redfield 3X9X40 scope.
Vasportsman’s Savage 110
Image

This is my Savage 110 in .270 Win. that was my father-in-law's before mine, and has taken many whitetail deer over the years. I absolutely love this gun, and killed my first deer with it. The action is flawless, and the accuracy, while not sub MOA, is pretty darned close and more than good enough to get the job done. My father-in-law upgraded to a Weatherby Vanguard in .30/06 and it is an MOA shooter, however, in my experience with that rifle and a cold barrel, it cannot be counted on in a pinch. This Savage, however, can sit in the case all year and be brought out on opening day, and it will be there the same as it was last year, which has happened due to college responsibilities. It is topped with a Bushnell Sportview wide-angle scope and Weaver see-through mounts. It has a 22-inch barrel, durable synthetic stock, and a Safari sling. It does not have the Accu-Trigger or the Timney upgrade to the trigger, so it does have a lot of creep, however, since this is virtually the only rifle I shoot regularly and the only one I hunt with, I have become quite accustomed to it and fairly proficient with it.
You know the drill by now: vote and comment below, and send your gun pictures and a paragraph about the gun to fsgunnuts@gmail.com.

  • Marlin X7
    Image
    50%​
  • Savage 110
    Image
    49%​
Total Votes: 202​
 
#2 ·
I would only be interested in which one shoots better. As far as fine details go, they are about the same except your X7 is a stainless. It would cost a lot more to get that in a Savage. I think the stainless X7 is a much better value than a blued non-accutrigger 110 (basically a Stevens 200). But if in factory form the Savage was MOA with factory ammo and the X7 were not, I would take the Savage.
 
#6 ·
Have had one of each... My 270 savage is a tack driver... Have complete confidence in that rifle... It didn't like Remington 130 gr green box ammo... About a three to four inch group at 50 yds... Switched to Winchester 150 gr... Groups at one inch all the way to one hundred yards... Anytime I hunt with that rifle I know I hold right on and squeeze....


Had a XS-7 in 7mm-08... Loved it... Shot extremely well with the hornady ammo I received with the gun in the trade... Pointed well, carried well too...

But when it came time to generate some cash towards another rifle... The marlin was the one to go...

The guy that bought it loves it too...
 
#7 ·
For the price paid, the marlin is a better buy. I've been living with Salvages for a several decades, and my X's for several years.
Both have a synthetic stock, only slightly less rigid than a toilet paper roll; check!
Horribly soft castings, and fitment that would embarrass the 1930's Russian military complex, coupled with a QC program that at best works a few days a week. Savage has built the same quality of a product since day one, the Stevens line are still priced according to what you get. Why a trigger plagued with creep & half drops; coupled with a stock incorporating roofing tin (known for cracking) is magically worth more than double in price is still beyond me.
Don't get me wrong, I still own a couple Savages, but I have no illusions about what they are. $300 beginner rifles.
While not nearly the same sample size, my X's are a consistently higher quality product, for the same price.

It will be interesting to see now that ATK bought Savage, what becomes of them.
Load, shoot, be merry.
 
#8 ·
I don't know about other's rifles, but I get sub-Moa with my XL7 with Hornady 110gr V-max at 3,450fps, Sierra 125gr Spitzer at 3,175fps, Hornady 165SST at 2750fps, and the Speer 200gr Hot cor at about 2550fps.
I bought a Savage 110 in 7mm-08 several years back. The rifle had chamber issues that cause the bolt to lock up about once every 4 or 5 shots. It ended up getting sent back to get fixed. When they charged me the shipping charges, I decided Savage would not see any more business from me. If I end up with a defective rifle I expect a sincere apology not another bill to get the rifle back.
I do not know if there is a low cost rifle maker made in America that I like anymore. I'll buy Howas and CZ if I am buying a new rifle. Those companies may not be any better, I do not know, but at least I have not been offended by them.
I loved Marlin, but they do not exist anymore.
 
#11 ·
Have both and I'd give the overall edge to the Marlin although I have an 80's vintage Savage 110V in 223 that will outshoot anything I have.

Minor gripe: why do people call the Marlin trigger a copy of Savage's Accu-trigger? Marlin's blocks the trigger and Savage's model blocks the sear. The Marlin actually copies the mechanics of an old Remington rolling block if my memory isn't totally shot and similar to that found on a handgun around 1900 (don't remember which). Probably just ranting, but it seems that when the two are compared like that the purpose is to deliberately place Marlin second. Nevermind, I guess I just need to go get my lunch.
 
#12 ·
I havent had any experience with the Marlin. I owned a Savage 111 in 30-06, and it was one of most accurate guns I ever owned. It was punishing to shoot though.