Been fortunate to pickup a couple of rifles in the last few days. One was an 1894CL NIB in .32-20. Rifle s/n places it as a 1990 gun. It has really nice wood and should make a good silhouette gun if I can get a tang sight on it without drilling the serial number! What was Marlin thinking?
The other is an 1894 in .25-20 with a 447xxx s/n (1910-ish?). It is marked .25-20 M. I am assuming that this is an M for Marlin and the caliber is plain vanilla .25-20 WCF. Is this a correct assumption?
This is what I will prefer to shoot silhouettes with. Someone has reblued and refinished the stock on what must have been a pretty clean rifle to start with and wrecked the collectable value but for a shooter it looks pretty good. Bore is fair to good but should improve with a healthy diet of hard cast bullets. This rifle has a Marbles Tang Sight and MVA Beach Sight inbound. Hopefully the Beach Sight will either be high enough or the Tang Sight low enough to shoot the chickens.
gary
The other is an 1894 in .25-20 with a 447xxx s/n (1910-ish?). It is marked .25-20 M. I am assuming that this is an M for Marlin and the caliber is plain vanilla .25-20 WCF. Is this a correct assumption?
This is what I will prefer to shoot silhouettes with. Someone has reblued and refinished the stock on what must have been a pretty clean rifle to start with and wrecked the collectable value but for a shooter it looks pretty good. Bore is fair to good but should improve with a healthy diet of hard cast bullets. This rifle has a Marbles Tang Sight and MVA Beach Sight inbound. Hopefully the Beach Sight will either be high enough or the Tang Sight low enough to shoot the chickens.
gary