Marlin Firearms Forum banner

factory recoil pad

4K views 15 replies 10 participants last post by  Sportster  
#1 ·
I have just taken posession of my "first 444"
I am almost positive i am going to replace the butt stock. Problem is it has a Marlin recoil pad that looks good.
how do you remove the pad? this is a 1975 model i would like to save the pad if possible
it shows no marks that i can see. where the screws would be.
HELP!
 
#2 ·
The recoil pad on the olders .444's is commonly called a "rock". ;D Just poke a screwdriver down in there and get a firm grip with pressure and the two screws will come right out.

Dave 8)
 
#3 ·
rex, here's a pic of the buttpad I took off my .444, you might not see the screws in the face of the pad but they are there. I suggest a little moisture on the screwdriver shaft for easier turning of the screws, there might be some wire brads holding on any spacer plate too. Mr fixit
 
#4 ·
OK
it is going to take some poking around cause their are no holes or indicators where the screws are, all other pads i have messed with have an indicator
in the rubber showing where the holes are, or even small holes this pad has nothimg but is good live rubber.

Thanks for the help
 
#7 ·
The Decelerator is a fine pad. My 'smith installed one on my old Savage .358 Win. What a difference!
 
#9 ·
I like that "rock" pad. It lets me know I'm not shooting some wimpy little small bore! Man up and shoot that bad boy!! ;D
 
#10 ·
Mr.Fixit, What scope and rings you got asitting there? Sure looks low, no danger of mistaking it for see-thru's :eek: ;D

I'm afraid I have some Medium Kwik-Site rings on mine and its just too #**& tall, gonna have to go lower with my scope or have my chin fixed like Jay Lenos ;D
 
#11 ·
.DIRTY-.THIRTY said:
Mr.Fixit, What scope and rings you got asitting there? Sure looks low, no danger of mistaking it for see-thru's :eek: ;D

I'm afraid I have some Medium Kwik-Site rings on mine and its just too #**& tall, gonna have to go lower with my scope or have my chin fixed like Jay Lenos ;D
Dirty Thirty, I wish I could tell you for certain, probably med Weavers, that's all been changed over, now I have a Nikon 1.6-5x36 with Weaver med quick release rings, haven't really gave it a wringing out yet, but plan to this summer. Mr fixit
Image

Image
 
#12 ·
I'd replace the pad but having to cut the stock down would greatly reduce the value of my rifle. I don't think the .444 kicks much.
 
#13 ·
Don't know who your comment is directed to Sportster, but my stock hasn't been cut and the butt pad is 1" thick, over all I think I gained 3/8" from the stock butt pad and to be honest I really like the way the cannon comes to the shoulder now....very comfortable for me. Mr fixit BTW... Like your avatar!
 
#14 ·
Sportster said:
would greatly reduce the value of my rifle.
I always wonder about comments like this since I think a rifle I don't want to shoot has no value at all. I'm glad you followed up with this.

I don't think the .444 kicks much.
The way I think, a used and useful Marlin will always be worth as much as another. If one's been competently shortened and had a nice, effective buttpad installed, it's got as much value or maybe more than the one that's stock and needs to be cut down and have a pad installed. If you're going to keep it in the safe and let it "appreciate", I just don't understand that. :-\
 
#15 ·
Any change from factory condition reduces resale value. If you plan on keeping it the rest of your life it's a non-issue.
 
#16 ·
I agree as long as the originals are retained there is no issue. My .444 was so boogered up by the PO that I doubt I'd hurt it's value. I only paid $163.00 for it. It looks and shoots great now.