The equipment used and the technique applied only matter if they make a difference in the outcome.
The simple truth is that many “benchrest techniques” and “latest fads” do not make a difference in observable accuracy in many rifles and in a lot of average usage….and I am enough of a statistician and I shoot enough to know what helps me and what does not. If you are one of those people do whatever helps.
I have a lot of concentricity tools, neck turning equipment, chronographs, straight line dies including classic Wilson benchrest dies, the whole bit.
If you don’t have a benchrest rifle, benchrest accuracy will elude you no matter how much benchrest equipment you own. The main equipment limitation is the rifle itself, and if that is not acknowledged all the ancillary tools you buy are not going to turn it into a bughole gun. One of the fallacies of reloading is that rifles that are inherently limited in accuracy can be miraculously turned into very wonderful shooters by the magical application of anal retentive accuracy techniques.
If one believes that, show up at a benchrest match with a 336 or 1895 and let us know how you do.
Not saying that good quality very accurate rifles don’t deserve careful reloading application. Just saying that first one must be aware of what equipment, including the rifle, is really limiting by an honest appraisal of what you have. Shoot in a statistical way and prove to yourself what actually helps and what does not.
In the matches I shoot in everyone is aware of the latest equipment and use it.
Here’s the real secret…….the best shooters win matches when the equipment is a level playing field. The one thing that is not equal in a match is shooter skill. One notices that winners usually win often, and that is primarily skill in shooting. Equipment improvements help most when the shooting skill is there to prove it matters and the rifle can tell the difference.