Marlin Firearms Forum banner

45/70 barrel cut to guide gun length

1 reading
9.7K views 24 replies 19 participants last post by  Mtwoodson  
#1 ·
This might be a touchy subject to some and I will be called insane, let me make my case:

I have read more scary stories about new Marlins and their quality than I can think off, but I'd love to have a guide gun length 45-70. So my only choice would be to get an old, pre cross bolt safety 22", and cut the barrel and tap for a new front sight. Please don't hold back, I would really appreciate an honest opinion.

1) Has anybody here on the forum cut a Marlin barrel on the 45-70 ?
2) I don't think it will effect the recoil one bit, right ?
3) Would the value be going down to zero and a sin ( I think I know the answer to that one )


There are some marked JM barreled 45-70's out there, but I still don't like the safety

Hopefully someone will straighten me out and tell me that there are 18" 45-70's JM marked with no cross bolt safety's out there.
 
#2 ·
I don't have an 18 inch barrel on mine, but the shorter barrel will most likely make the recoil heavier and the muzzleblast greater. However, several of the guys have shortened their rifles and they love them. Let us know how this project goes!

Ron
 
#4 ·
It's hard to go wrong with any crown other than not to do one. 45 is fine. My advice is if your going to cut it then really cut it short. 16" is minimum to be legal in the USA. So why not go 16.5"? Oh and yea, it will have a touch more recoil and more blast but it will be incredibly handy. Consider cutting 1" off the butt stock.

Real Carbines are awesome. It's like going from a full sized sedan to a mustang or vette. If you are considering it you won't be disappointed.
 
#6 · (Edited)
I like mikewoods idea of cutting it down to 16.5"... This is the most fun caliber to shoot in my humble opinion. Tested a 45-70 at the range about a month ago and fell in love instantly (not with the rifle, it was a rossi, but with the caliber). Hope to find one, which is not 100% perfect, get a good deal, cut it and have some fun... Plus more than likely my wife won't like to shoot it, even though she's starting to look a little to close at my slug queen, the remington 870 wingmaster, lol.

When I see a cross bolt safety, reminds me of this image

 
#10 ·
959, I did what you are thinking about. I had my 1895 XLR with the 24 inch barrel cut to 18.5 inches. Sent it to Grizzly and had him do a little action and loading gate work at the same time. The gun as it was originally was too heavy and too long. It seldom left my safe. I longed for the 450 Guide Gun I had sold earlier, not for the caliber but for the size of the gun.

The cut down gun is nothing short of fantastic. What I have is a stainless steel guide gun with a pistol grip. The gun simply fits me much better than the original. It is lighter than it was with the long barrel. That long barrel has a lot of leverage to use against you. My guns shoots at least as good as before the chop job. Maybe there is an increase recoil and in muzzle blast, but I have not noticed it. I think it probably is a little heaver than the guide gun, but that is a positive in my book. Seems to balance better and probably tames recoil better over a guide gun. Overall I have no regrets what so ever, except that maybe I should have had it done sooner.

Even better, after I played around with it awhile after the cut job I removed the scope and now use a ghost ring with an ivory front bead. Such a handy rifle with a scope just did not make sense. I am 67 next month and pretty much crippled up with injuries, but I can hit a beer can at 75 yards with the ghost ring and probably farther out than that. That is my brush gun anyway so that is enough. I have other rifles with scopes if I want to reach out a ways.
 
#12 ·
Thanks Gladesman, I needed some confirmation on my crazy thinking from a seasoned marlin owner, thank you. If Marlin would ever dump Remington and their cross bolt safety, produce a stainless 16" 45-70 walnut stock guide gun, they could ask any amount and people would wait in line for them with a smile on their faces ....:marchmellow:
 
#14 ·
first advantage, in thick brush and scrub, won't catch on things as easily. second advantage theoretically, quicker target aquisition. third lighter for long term carrying when out moving through brush etc when actively hunting versus sitting in a stand or blind.:biggrin:
 
#15 ·
I have an 1895 that has been cut back to 18"s and I can't say enough good about it. Compared to my full length Cowboy it is lighter and handier to maneuver in and out of blinds, treestands, vehicles, boats, etc., and balances well for carry in a backpack scabbard. There may or may not be more recoil than with the long barrel version, but felt recoil actually seems less to me, as the push is more directly back, with less muzzle flip. Accuracy is as good or better as well, again probably due to less jump and less barrel whip. here's a couple pics.
 

Attachments

#16 ·
I have an 1895 STBL with the 181/2 barrel, full length mag. and pistol grip. It has become my favorite rifle for deer/bear here in VA since buying it two years ago. It is extremely accurate and works great.
Use it with a Leupold 2x7 glass on most days, but it hunting a really thick area or sometimes just for fun, I switch to a Burris FastFire II. Great little sight. Makes the 45/70 every handy and light. They interchange without changing POI.