Marlin Firearms Forum banner

1 - 20 of 40 Posts

·
Administrator
Joined
·
27,727 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Apparently, leftist judges can't read, or can't accept what they read. I've had enough of the criminal left justices in the 9th Circuit Court!

"The majority uses long-winded, and often, out-of-context quotes from irrelevant laws, to obfuscate the irrelevancy in 109 pages.

The second argument is to ignore the right to bear arms because Heller did not specifically cover the right to bear arms outside the home. In other words, because the Supreme Court did not directly mention it in Heller, it does not exist.

Judge O’Scannlain, dissenting, states it bluntly:

The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms.”U.S. Const. amend. II (emphasis added). Today, a majority of our court has decided that the Second Amendment does not mean what it says. Instead, the majority holds that while the Second Amendment may guarantee the right to keep a firearm for self-defense within one’s home, it provides no right whatsoever to bear—i.e., to carry—that same firearm for self-defense in any other place.
The Ninth Circuit is the most overturned Circuit Court in the country.

It will take time to appeal the case to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is not required to take it. Several other cases are in the process about the right to bear arms outside the home."



Be sure to read Shummer's totalitarian threat aimed at the SC.

Jack


 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
11,671 Posts
Well the whole problem is that the idiots in government and courts have a reading comprehension issue.
They read the 2nd as applying to people when it is VERY clear that it is written to address the government.
It specifically tells the government you have no say in a persons right to self defense. None. You may NOT infringe on the people's rights to self defense.
We have allowed them so shift the language to make it about what rights people have. People have ALL the rights - the government has only those spelled out as allowed and everything else please to keep your idiot paws off of.
Subtle, but the when they word it as to what is "allowed" it alters the narrative and obfuscates the intent to be the exact opposite of what was actually stated..
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,618 Posts
One sentence, 27 words long.
And an entire court of lawyers can't figure out its plain meaning.
Is there any wonder why the People are fearful, suspicious, angry at their government?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
157 Posts
Apparently, leftist judges can't read, or can't accept what they read. I've had enough of the criminal left justices in the 9th Circuit Court!

"The majority uses long-winded, and often, out-of-context quotes from irrelevant laws, to obfuscate the irrelevancy in 109 pages.

The second argument is to ignore the right to bear arms because Heller did not specifically cover the right to bear arms outside the home. In other words, because the Supreme Court did not directly mention it in Heller, it does not exist.

Judge O’Scannlain, dissenting, states it bluntly:


The Ninth Circuit is the most overturned Circuit Court in the country.

It will take time to appeal the case to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is not required to take it. Several other cases are in the process about the right to bear arms outside the home."



Be sure to read Shummer's totalitarian threat aimed at the SC.

Jack


The ninth circuit court of schlameels has NEVER gotten anything right. Trump did his best to stuff it with conservatives, but they still have a lot of liberals on it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
16,583 Posts
Where the federal courts, up to and including the Supreme Court, rely on case law that is biased in the government’s favor, it is the individual and sovereign states that retain the final and determining interpretation of the Constitution, which has always been intended to protect the people from their own government.
Our focus should be on our own states’ efforts to nullify all un-Constitutional laws.
R/Griff
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
16,789 Posts
niNtH couRT....

exemplifies an office full of yuppys.....

not one of 'em.......ever did a days work. not once in they worthless lives.

like the vp, they get to where they are..........by lickin' the boss dry.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,028 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
11,633 Posts
And in Florida we have bill HM 1301.

The bill voices the Legislature’s stance against Biden's gun control proposals.
Rep. Jason Shoaf has filed a House Memorial to formally reject President Joe Biden’s efforts on gun control.
The legislation (HM 1301) voices the Legislature’s stance against Biden’s gun control proposals, calling the measures “unconstitutional.” The memorial goes on to communicate the Legislature’s intent to use “all lawful means necessary to resist and overturn any federal gun-control measures that violate the right of Floridians to keep and bear arms.”
“The Second Amendment is a right and freedom on which our nation was founded. The President’s proposed restrictions violate our U.S. Constitution,” Shoaf said in a news release. “What’s more, these actions limit our ability to keep our families safe.”
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
16,583 Posts
I’m hearing directly from Florida’s top GOA lobbyist that DeSantis won’t push the GOP majority legislature to pass these pro-2A bills.
He is a forum member on the Florida Shooters Network and provides timely updates on his efforts in Tallahassee. Recommend all Florida gun owners join up over there.
R/Griff
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,015 Posts
Interesting article on the "9th Circus" and some insight into it's problems
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Wikipedia

47 justices and who appointed them:
Nixon 2
Carter 3
Regan 3
GHW Bush 2
Clinton 13
GW Bush 7
Obama 7
Trump 10

Can you imagine trying to get 47 lawyers to agree on anything???
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
27,727 Posts
Discussion Starter #14
Where the federal courts, up to and including the Supreme Court, rely on case law that is biased in the government’s favor, it is the individual and sovereign states that retain the final and determining interpretation of the Constitution, which has always been intended to protect the people from their own government.
Our focus should be on our own states’ efforts to nullify all un-Constitutional laws.
R/Griff

Agreed, James. Yet, that notion fails conservatives living in commie CA which is a hopeless cause and a prime reason to depart this state.

Jack
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
14,212 Posts
You have to quit looking at the Constitution in relation to the Liberal Left as some kind of exercise in logic. There is no attempt at logic with these people. They are radical activist. They are NGSBs and will lie and slander to get their rulings made.
When a Federal Judge is making decision after decision that is overturned by SCOTUS he should be impeached. That is what impeachment is for. Don’t mean jack at present because it has to go through Congress. Dems won’t allow fellow radical to be put out of court.
It doesn’t take a lawyer to read and understand the constitution. What we have to prevent is allowing lawyers to make their version of it law. I think the 2nd has been kicked around enough and SCOTUS should make a strong and concise definition and ruling on it. Once and for all, and kick out the feel good acts of the past.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
16,583 Posts
Agreed, James. Yet, that notion fails conservatives living in commie CA which is a hopeless cause and a prime reason to depart this state.

Jack
It’s not just California. Big problem in all states. They’ve forgotten why we fought to retain states’ rights in the 1860s.
Before we can save the 2nd, we need to reaffirm the 10th.
R/Griff
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
16,583 Posts
You have to quit looking at the Constitution in relation to the Liberal Left as some kind of exercise in logic. There is no attempt at logic with these people. They are radical activist. They are NGSBs and will lie and slander to get their rulings made.
When a Federal Judge is making decision after decision that is overturned by SCOTUS he should be impeached. That is what impeachment is for. Don’t mean jack at present because it has to go through Congress. Dems won’t allow fellow radical to be put out of court.
It doesn’t take a lawyer to read and understand the constitution. What we have to prevent is allowing lawyers to make their version of it law. I think the 2nd has been kicked around enough and SCOTUS should make a strong and concise definition and ruling on it. Once and for all, and kick out the feel good acts of the past.
The Constitution is our states’ legal precedent to go to war against Washington, D.C..
We better have a crystal clear vision of that.
R/Griff
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
27,727 Posts
Discussion Starter #20
The Constitution is our states’ legal precedent to go to war against Washington, D.C..
We better have a crystal clear vision of that.
R/Griff

Well, speaking of being crystal clear, we might get to the root of the problem, being the leftists that infiltrate/occupy political office and courts which all need to be removed, period!

There is a reason I have the following in my signature:
All that the South has ever desired was that the Union, as established by our forefathers, should be preserved, and that the government, as originally organized, should be administered in purity and truth. – Robert E. Lee

Jack
 
1 - 20 of 40 Posts
Top