Marlin Firearms Forum banner
1 - 20 of 20 Posts

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,761 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Be prepared to be outraged...


But maybe not in the way you were expecting.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
20,502 Posts
I think those scrambled pictures behind her is actually what's goin' on in her head!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,222 Posts
I think she needs to read the declaration of independence."We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
She is right no slip of paper or government grants our rights.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,368 Posts
She's pretty sarcastic, good for her.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,109 Posts
The very first words, about some people think the 2nd is outdated because the government is so well armed the people couldn't over throw it, she doesn't say believes it, she goes on to point out the power of a well armed state over the people, not sure where she proved herself anti-gun. She obviously doesn't care about erosion of other rights, but seems to be saying arms are needed by the people if the government has so many arms. Or at least the rate of violence by state controlled arms and agents, far exceed those of privately held arms, just the press doesn't represent it in the proper perspective, which would seem pro-gun. She has an interesting perspective, that is very confused and not generally correct.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,146 Posts
I seems that she is saying that if lib-trisomics believe the 2nd amendment is outdated, then they should also apply the same logic to the other amendments. that and the fact that there is no need for any piece of paper or other "men" to grant you the right to life and self-defense.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,368 Posts
This girl is being sarcastic, her point is not anti-gun but rather if you apply liberal logic to
the other amendments which as she points out are more destructive to the country than
people who own guns.
Out of control police, presidents who wage war without congressional approval,
real freedom of the press. Notice how she says the press is owned by 4 corporate
entities?

Sarcasm doesn't work for everyone but her points are well taken.
The founding fathers couldn't envision everything nor did they need to.
Her point is that the left is making stupid and pointless arguments most of which
are the same rhetoric used for everything and she's right.

To really sell it she should have said "Whatever" after every comment that's what
my kids did when they were being sarcastic.

I'm half Scot, I understand sarcasm really well.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,761 Posts
Discussion Starter · #8 ·
I found this video after watching the Penn and Teller defense of the Second Amendment.

This girl looks like a liberal hippy, but looks are deceiving...

(I was expecting a real different point of view from her.)

If you had a problem with what she says, I'm gonna guess you didn't watch it all the way through.

Her whole rant is a defense of the US Constitution....

So if you don't like it, maybe yer a commie.

:biggrin:

Brocky
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
16,687 Posts
The very first words, about some people think the 2nd is outdated because the government is so well armed the people couldn't over throw it, she doesn't say believes it, she goes on to point out the power of a well armed state over the people, not sure where she proved herself anti-gun. She obviously doesn't care about erosion of other rights, but seems to be saying arms are needed by the people if the government has so many arms. Or at least the rate of violence by state controlled arms and agents, far exceed those of privately held arms, just the press doesn't represent it in the proper perspective, which would seem pro-gun. She has an interesting perspective, that is very confused and not generally correct.
100 million (at least) armed citizens vs. 2.2 million military members...good luck with that, demo-publican do-gooders!
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
8,177 Posts
Be prepared to be outraged...


But maybe not in the way you were expecting.
This bimbo would be better suited for a career in porn rather than trying to comprehend the constitution,let alone explaining it to others.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
6,933 Posts
Sarcasm.


Mike T.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brocky

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,368 Posts
Yeah that girl is actually spot on. She is being sarcastic.
She seems to understand the Constitution rather well.

Here is where she burns her Obama shirt.

 
  • Like
Reactions: JACKTW and Brocky

·
Administrator
Joined
·
28,334 Posts
Yeah, a heavy dose of sarcasm at that. Throw in a bit of mocking liberal narratives as well. She is a thinker no doubt and pleasant on the eyes too.

Jack
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,011 Posts
Cool! She's a "reformed" self-described Obama nut.

Although I applaud her relization of the scam this administration is, her attempt to "absolve" herself by burning her t-shirt is as meaningful as a fart in the breeze. You can't absolve yourself. You're responsible. Your supported and hired a guy who was under qualified, without credentials, socialist ties, running on a platform of "hope and change" (what's that?) and who's running mate and now complete administration are all insider old-guard. Although nobody could have predicted how bad your guy could have been, everybody should have known he was the wrong guy or at the very least, not ready for the job. Sweet heart... that's not on Obama. That's on you. That T-shirt will rise from the ashes like a Phoenix and follow you around for the rest of your life. You're pretty and educated but you're still a dope. Now that we've established that, glad to see your growing up and acknowledging the consequences of your actions.
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
28,334 Posts
Judging by the responses here I wouldn't use "we." Better a reformed dope than remaining a dope forever. She was young, inexperienced and impressionable when she voted for O and now she is more experienced and wise to lying politico's. Certainly, she is vastly more engaged in 'thinking and reflection' than the vast majority of young adults these days.

No, I give her kudos for coming to her senses and getting it. She is far from being a dope today, or a bimbo more suited for what was stated above. Rather than holding her down forever I'd rather let her rise above her past errors and to her potential as well as rise above the masses of non-thinking idiots who are more concerned with the next American Idol than their country and their future liberties and freedom.

Choose as you wish.

Jack
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
25,165 Posts
She reminds me of myself during the late 1970s. My first ever Presidential vote went for the Peanut Farmer back in 1976. Last Democrat I ever voted for.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
16,687 Posts
She reminds me of myself during the late 1970s. My first ever Presidential vote went for the Peanut Farmer back in 1976. Last Democrat I ever voted for.
Yep, as I understand it, the ICC was his bright idea, or at least he enthusiastically supported it.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
6,933 Posts
She reminds me of myself during the late 1970s. My first ever Presidential vote went for the Peanut Farmer back in 1976. Last Democrat I ever voted for.
Yeah, the few times I voted for a Democrat I lived to regret it. However, the Republicans (since Ronald Reagan) were not that much better. At one time politicans had to "kiss a lot of babies" to help them get elected. Now, the anatomy of what they kiss just to survive is beyond what I would be willing to do. There are so many factions in our country now that will not, and cannot, agree on very much. The cause of that problem primarily is the results of the Federal Government's refusal to guard and enforce border control. Obama is the biggest offender in this issue, but he is not the only one that is at fault. Our good ole boy George W. is no shining example of what we need in the White House either. The head of the Border Agents union has a video clip on Foxnews about the Feds dropping the ball and tieing their hands for the last "50 years". The Congress stinks but the Executive branch is filled with a bunch of Traitors.

The Russians are going to be laughing up their sleeve when an open revolt takes place in this country.




Mike T.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brocky and JACKTW

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,269 Posts
A sleep at the wheel, a dip stick.
 
1 - 20 of 20 Posts
Top