I have both the Redfield 4-12X40 accu-range reticle on a 30-06 and the Leupold Rifleman 3-9X40 wide duplex (not long range duplex) on the 338ME. I really like both of them. I don't make enough money to go beatin up a VXIII hunting:=)). I do wish I would've got the LR reticle with the rifleman though. I had a Nikon Pro Staff on the 338ME but it bounced all over, couldn't shoot a 6" group at 100 yards. I put my sons Leupold on it and viola... 1.5"(no droop by the way 92xxxxx ser no). So, I took back the Nikon and bought the Leupold. For the money, the Leupold pulls the light in pretty good at dawn and so does the Redfield. At 300 yards the 30-06 150 grn spire point 2600 mv with the accu-range at 12 power is on target dot below the circle at 300 and its 1.5" high at 100. I may be wrong, but i'd think the 338 trajectory may be a little flatter than the ammo I am shooting with the 30-06. I need to do an actual comparison though. Think you'll like either one and both are made in the USA! Think you might be able to get the accu-range or whatever long range reticle to work by working with your scope power settings. Its either Leupold or Redfield web sight has a good video how to do it. As you zoom in on an image your LR reticle dots narrow on your target so you can change point of impact with zoom. A little work, and you can get almost any LR reticle to work once you know your range and zoom that works for your trajectory. Hope I explained that right:=)