Marlin Firearms Forum banner

1 - 8 of 8 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
65 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Thought I'd share this with you guys....The 1894S I purchased new, maybe 20 rnds down the tube since I've owned it. Just picked up the Redhawk this past Fri in .41 Mag. Was looking for a Smith Mod 57 or 58, but they are getting away from me in price. Anyway, am very satisfied and will get to the range soon to see what the Ruger is capable of.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,536 Posts
Sweet! Gotta love a good levergun revolver combo. Keep us up to speed on how well they shoot the same ammo...
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
7,974 Posts
I have never, ever shot a .41 mag in a revolver or a rifle ::). That's kind of hard to believe especially since I have always heard how great a cailber it is. Maybe someday soon ...


bjm
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
586 Posts
I've owned several S&W .41 mags. A few years ago, outside Rochester, NY, I saw an 1894 in .41 and a S&W 657 offered as a pair. I'm pretty sure the cost was around $1,100. I didn't buy them, and I've regretted it ever since. I also like the Redhawk in .41. Nice acquisition!
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,479 Posts
Is the Redhawk new or used? Are they making them, again?

That's a sweet 1894!!! That is what I'm turning my FG into slowly but surely...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
476 Posts
I've been a big .41 fan since buying my first Blackhawk in .41, back in 1967. It was stolen, so I next bought a Smith 57, but traded for a Ruger Redhawk .41. Then I added a Smith 657, then a Marlin 1894 .41, and finally a Thompson Contender in .41. In one way, at least in some guns, it's actually better than a .44 Mag. .41 Magnums have always had a fairly fast rifling twist rate, while most (not all) .44s had a very slow twist. That means that bullets that are "heavy for caliber", like 280+ grains in .41, stabilize better than a comparable bullet in a .44 (like a 300+ grain). Of course, both are great cartridges, but the .41 is quite special, and a handloaders prize.
 
1 - 8 of 8 Posts
Top