Marlin Owners
March 12, 2010, 06:55:36 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: WELCOME TO MARLINOWNER'S  PLEASE CLICK ON OUR SITE SPONSERS BUTTONS AND VIEW THE AWESOME PRODUCTS THEY OFFER
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Suppressing my 1895  (Read 1648 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
civilian75
Tinhorn
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 55



« on: November 20, 2009, 12:07:24 AM »

A fellow MarlinOwner user heard (or read) me say I would be suppressing my Guide Gun. Since he made me worked so hard Tongue on my reply, I though it would make a good MarlinOwners 45-70 topic.

I recently acquired my first lever action gun, a Marlin 1895GS. I was inspired by a FFL/SOT friend who cut his Puma M92 bbl to a stupid short 10.5”, “Just because I can” he says, and attached his full auto Uzi suppressor to it. The thing is Hollywood quiet. Puff, puff!  It got me at hello! Ever since, suppressing a lever is all I wanted to do Tongue.  

I worked up the subsonic load with 405gr on top of Trailboss. But I haven't yet gotten the suppressor or threaded the barrel.  That will be another 8-10 month wait if it is anything like when I got my 308 can. :@.

My 1st serious suppressor was a YHM 308. Great value and customer service! That’s why I have my sights on a 45 Cobra.   I exchanged email with YHM customer service, I asked,

Quote
“what is the maximum muzzle pressure it is designed to sustain (not full auto) w/o weakening it? Can it endure 44RemMag handgun muzzle pressures? Can the baffles accommodate a .458" diameter projectile?

and they said:
Quote
Sir,
Yes, you may shoot Remington .44 magnum out of the Cobra M2 .45 cal suppressor without any problems. Yes, technically it can accommodate a.458projectile, however if you are thinking of shooting a 458 SOCOM through it, no, it has too much pressure and you will blow the can up. As long as you stay at the maximum pressure load of a .45 you could shoot it through it.

The problem here is they do not say what the pressures are. That made it a bit more interesting for me.

When I started reloading for my 308Win bolt, I decided I needed Quickload s/w.  It helps a great deal on stuff like this. I would not trust my life on it (it has been off more than once), but at least I gives you a pretty decent ball park. I always double check with actual published load data, though.

As per Quickload, a hot 185gr 45ACP+P can develop up to 4kpsi muzzle pressure (PM) on a 5” 1911. On a carry version, MP can go over 5kpsi. But I have not yet found any evidence anyone has suppressed one. That will be a future topic at SilencerTalk.com.

I am not too concerned, though. I know it can be done, as long as I keep the pressures low. My current subsonic load is tuned to 1050 fps. Quickload does not have Trailboss in their database, but, 11gr of Red Dot under a 405gr pile driver generates a mere 1.1kpsi MP out of a 18.5” bbl and 1050fps. And if for some reason that turns up to be too hot, I will just tone it down a bit more. But I don’t think that will be necessary.

My FFL/SOT friend shoots factory 240gr XTP 44SPC. (Quickload: 2.2kpsi with 11gr Blue Dot, 985fps). He also tried a bunch of 300gr on 44RemMag cases with no incidents (no idea on the load data).

But, hey! Let’s say the stupid 45 can would take nothing but the quintessential subsonic 45ACP round, a 230gr FMJ on a milspec 1911. Well, that produces 3kpsi MP with 6.1gr of Unique, (per Quickload)!

So if Quickload can be trusted at all, and my friends 10.5” Puma can be accepted as evidence, I’d say that, as long as you keep ‘em subsonic, yes, a 45 can should be safe on a 45 cal lever rifle, or a 44 to that matter.

That said, whatever you do, do it at your own risk. I’d work up a load and stop at the first remotely suspicious sight of trouble. And, make sure your can’s mfg has excellent customer service, if you catch my drift. Cheesy





Logged

“Then he isn’t safe?” said Lucy...."‘'Course he isn’t safe.  But he’s good.  He’s the King I tell you.”
wreckhog
Sidewinder
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 149


« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2009, 06:25:11 AM »

How about a .452 projectile out of a .45LC gun. That is only .001 larger than a .45ACP projectile.
Logged
Snew
Deadeye
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 546


« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2009, 09:25:24 AM »

How about a .452 projectile out of a .45LC gun. That is only .001 larger than a .45ACP projectile.

If it'll take a .44Mag I'd hazard to guess that the .45 colt would be doable as well since it's lower pressure. I just don't know if case pressure is directly proportional to muzzle pressure. Pick a can and ask the manufacturer.

I've been thinking about suppressing a 45/70 too, and what I've been told matches what you've heard. A 45/70 has less pressure at the muzzle than a .45ACP. I haven't asked any specific manufacturers myself though. Just fellow enthusiasts. I'm  afan of SWR. I think I'll drop them an email and let you know what they say.
Logged

Steven
lever addict
Marlin Marksman
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711


N.E. Pennsylvania


« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2009, 02:45:40 PM »

Why would you do this? Maybe you bought the wrong gun!!!
Logged

I see your lips moving, but I can't hear a word your saying!
civilian75
Tinhorn
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 55



« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2009, 05:07:32 PM »

Funny. I am trying to close the deal with my FFL/SOT. He is putting a lot of pressure on me to go with a custom SRT 45 cal (submachine/rifle grade). I am not totally sold. Let's see. The price is good, though.

By the way, I just noticed my FFL/SOT friend is selling his SRB/Suppressed Puma. So if you can shell out $1.2k plus 400 in tax stamps...

http://www.shop.orl-llc.com/SBR-Rossi-Model-92-44mag-SBRRossi92.htm

Logged

“Then he isn’t safe?” said Lucy...."‘'Course he isn’t safe.  But he’s good.  He’s the King I tell you.”
Snew
Deadeye
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 546


« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2009, 06:28:02 PM »

Why would you do this? Maybe you bought the wrong gun!!!

I'm as perplexed as you but the other way around. I don't understand how or why you would ask that of come to that conclusion. A suppressor has a whole host of benefits even if you're not firing subsonic ammo. In addition to the sound reduction it eliminates flash and GREATLY reduces recoil. I almost find it hard to believe all guns don't run around with at least the option to mount a suppressor.
Logged

Steven
dogg
Tinhorn
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 49


« Reply #6 on: November 21, 2009, 08:46:28 AM »

Snew, answer to the above in 4 letters and one word :  BATF and Money
Logged
Gaterskiner
Gunfighter
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 880



« Reply #7 on: November 21, 2009, 09:10:23 AM »

What kind of trajectery do you get with A subsonic .405? Huh
Logged

"We have room for all of Alaskas wildlife, Right next to the mashed potatos"- Sarah Palin
Snew
Deadeye
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 546


« Reply #8 on: November 21, 2009, 10:36:59 AM »

Snew, answer to the above in 4 letters and one word :  BATF and Money

I was only extolling the virtues of suppressors. You bring up an interesting point though. It's my opinion we shouldn't have to pay extra or jump through any hoops to have one. Sadly, we do.

The money is minimal, or would be if we didn't have to also modify our rifles because they don't come ready to accept a muzzle device. Before seeing them, shooting, them and talking with a bunch of owners of them, I viewed it as an insurmountable hurdle as well. It's easy for me now to justify the money. There's no way to get there without being around them though.

Now, if you're just trying to keep you name out of an illegal database somewhere, don't fool yourself. If you're worried about it they already know who you are. That can't be it though because you're registered on a gun forum on the net.   Wink
Logged

Steven
civilian75
Tinhorn
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 55



« Reply #9 on: November 21, 2009, 07:51:03 PM »

Quote
What kind of trajectery do you get with A subsonic .405?

A long and wonderful raaaaiiiinbow. Smiley

Subsonic has its uses. For me, it is the joy if removing my hearing protection, shoot at my armored plate hangin' from my target stand, and be able to hear "puff.... CLANG".  I also have a suppressed 10/22. It's a lotsa fun too. But when I hits the plate, it goes "puff...click". The God-blessed 45-70 405gr is x10 heavier!! Cheesy Love it!!

I am over 50, and already losing some of my hearing to tinitus and old age. At this rate, in ~10, I won't need hearing protection or suppressors. Cheesy
Logged

“Then he isn’t safe?” said Lucy...."‘'Course he isn’t safe.  But he’s good.  He’s the King I tell you.”
civilian75
Tinhorn
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 55



« Reply #10 on: November 23, 2009, 03:57:32 PM »

So I decided to follow the "custom SRT 45 cal" route. It should let me fire full power rounds as well. I wonder how'll that work. At least it should take care of most of the recoil. :p

Now, to sit and wait... Tune back in ~ 8 months for a range report.
Logged

“Then he isn’t safe?” said Lucy...."‘'Course he isn’t safe.  But he’s good.  He’s the King I tell you.”
Quetico
Tinhorn
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 33


« Reply #11 on: November 24, 2009, 09:15:55 AM »

I, for one, would be very interested to see a pic of a working suppressed .45-70. I'd also be interested in knowing why anyone would want to put a can on a rifle of this caliber.  Huh Huh
Logged
Snew
Deadeye
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 546


« Reply #12 on: November 24, 2009, 09:41:44 AM »

Reread my post above. To me recoil reduction is a big one.
Logged

Steven
Quetico
Tinhorn
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 33


« Reply #13 on: November 24, 2009, 12:44:09 PM »

I saw that...

Sorry for introducing logic here, but it seems to me that if recoil reduction is the objective, this is the long way around the barn: Can ~ at LEAST $350-$500, BATF permits ~$200, gunsmith/personal time to modify, plus small parts (barrel connector) ~$200.

I think a Limbsaver is a cost-effective alternative (to say the least).

Of course, the follow up question is "If you're particularly sensitive to recoil, why are you shooting .45-70???"
Logged
leatherman
Tinhorn
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 75


« Reply #14 on: November 24, 2009, 01:02:21 PM »

For thoughs that are interested jbadams66 posted a link back on april 20, 2006 on this subject.

  www.stopsontfm.com/armes/marlin%20ang2.htm

 I don't know how to link the post.maybe someone else can.

Brian
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Please Send Donations by Check or Money Order to:
Marlin Owners
3104 Sherrywood Rd.
Edmond, Okla 73034


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.257 seconds with 21 queries.