+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18
Like Tree2Likes

Thread: Buttstock tube fed 22



  1. #1
    Marlin Marksman
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    N. Central Arkansas
    Posts
    1,615
    Member #
    14177
    Thanked
    1908 times

    Buttstock tube fed 22

    I have been curious about these 22's. What can ya'll tell me about them? Are they reliable & dependable ...etc? I would like to add one to my very meager collection if they are worth it in terms of reliability.

  2. #2
    Gun Wizard
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA
    Posts
    2,065
    Member #
    170
    Thanked
    526 times
    Which? I have an old buttstock-tube fed Mossberg semi-auto that works quite well. It is a bit more ackward to load than the under-the-barrel tubes, but it is also better protected against dings and dents. Modifying LOP is also a no-no.
    Speak softly, but ride like hell!"

  3. #3
    Gun Wizard
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Holt, Michigan
    Posts
    2,212
    Member #
    2273
    Thanked
    80 times
    We have had a few of them around here. I don't even remember the exact models. Maybe some variation of the Savage or Stevens lines. One Was a J C Higgens, who was Sears. There was one in particular, which had a two piece stock that extended up onto the sides of the receiver. I always liked that one. Isn't the Browning autoloader in the buttstock too?
    I have given up reality for Lever actions, Jeeps and have a wife that understands. It's a better world!
    Team 30-30 #236. Team 1894 #187.

  4. #4
    Sidewinder
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Eastern North Carolina
    Posts
    200
    Member #
    15000
    Thanked
    6 times
    My dad has a Remington Nylon 66 from the late 60's or early 70's. It holds 14 in the tube which is fed throught the buttstock. It is a very lightweight rifle and performs dutifully with decent ammo.
    XS7 .308, Synthetic Stock, Blued Barrel; Leupold STD 1-Pc Base, Matte, 51738; Leupold Med STD Rings, Matte, 49901; Nikon Prostaff 4-12x40 Mil-Dot, Matte; Orig. John Marlin
    XL7L .270, Marlin Laminate Stock, Blued Barrel; Leupold STD 1-Pc Base, Matte, 51736; Leupold Med STD Rings, Gloss, 49900; Leupold VX-I 3-9x40 Duplex, Gloss; Orig. John Marlin
    XS7S .243, Synthetic Stock, Stainless Barrel; Leupold STD 1-Pc Base, Silver, 51739; Leupold Med STD Rings, Silver, 49902; REP Marlin w/ North Haven Parts

  5. #5
    Contributing Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Taxland, Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,603
    Member #
    2619
    Thanked
    510 times
    I have two Marlin 88s and a Mossberg 51 that are butt stock tube fed and two of the three are fussy. There's a problem with the cartridge stop on one of the 88s that makes it operate only as a two shot. The spring must be weak on the 51 because the last round never gets pushed into the chamber.

    When they work, they are as fun to shoot as any 22.

    Nothing beats a detachable magazine for convenience and ease of use.
    Team 30-30 Member No. 223
    Team 444 Member No. 333

  6. #6
    Tenderfoot
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    16
    Member #
    25757
    Thanked
    1 times
    Nylon 66 is what came to my mind as well. I wrote to Santa every year for one of those growing up. He never seemed to get the letter(?) So, I ended up buying my own .22 from K-Mart with my paper route money: a Squires-Bingham Model 20 semi-auto.

  7. #7
    Marlin Marksman
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,582
    Member #
    13809
    Thanked
    1254 times
    Which one are you talking about? I have a Winchester model 141 and it works great. I know of a beautifully restored Marlin model 88 that also works great. The advantage of the tube feed through the stock is simply in good looks and a streamlined shape. If everything is working properly there isn't any difference between this style or layout of gun and any other well functioning 22.

    I like the looks of the 22 without the detachable box magazine sticking out the bottom, or the tube magazine going out the front, but still having the advantage of 10-15 shots in the magazine.

    M
    I am still clinging to guns and religion.



    Life Member, NRA
    Life Member, AMVETs
    Life Member, Military Police Regimental Association

    1893, 1894 CS, 1894 CB, 444SS, 39A Golden, 81 DL, 80 DL, Glenfield 30 "SC", 39M Octagon, and a 922M....

  8. #8
    Marlin Marksman
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    N. Central Arkansas
    Posts
    1,615
    Member #
    14177
    Thanked
    1908 times
    Thanks for all of the input. I was looking at this one in particular, but I was just wanting some general info on that type of feeding system.

    Item:10697866 Western Field Model 855 .22LR Semi-Auto Rifle For Sale at GunAuction.com

    Some feed from the side and some feed from the butt and I was curious if one type was more reliable than the other.

    Thanks again for sharing your info....and Merry Christmas everyone!!


    Ohh...I see now...it loads from the side and the tube goes in from the butt end....
    Last edited by granpa52; 12-17-2011 at 01:14 PM.

  9. #9
    Deadeye
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Junction City KS
    Posts
    589
    Member #
    16384
    Thanked
    424 times
    I have a 351 KA I took her out recently with Federal bulk blue box shot a magazinefull into a 1/3 inch group 25 yards. The trigger is a tad creepy but put a scope on one they shoot very well. You spend a bit more to find a new made to match many or the older 22s in shootability.

  10. #10
    Deadeye
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Junction City KS
    Posts
    589
    Member #
    16384
    Thanked
    424 times
    Yes the butt feed 22s are a little more reliable and a bit easier to clean. The loading and clearing of the weapon is more of a pain than a mag gun you got to pay attention to rounds stickin in tube and that is a accident waitin to happen.


Home | Forum | Active Topics | What's New | Subscribed Threads

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Similar Threads

  1. Crack in buttstock and off center magazine tube
    By Marlin Brando in forum 1894
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-09-2011, 12:40 AM
  2. Fur on buttstock
    By thebigslide in forum Do It Yourself Gunsmithing
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-15-2010, 12:27 AM
  3. Need a Buttstock for my 39D (same as 39A)?
    By axelson39D in forum Rimfires
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-25-2009, 08:14 PM
  4. I need a used 39A buttstock
    By bgl0b6 in forum Rimfires
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-16-2007, 05:23 PM
  5. Will buttstock fit?
    By Patch in forum Cowboy Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-12-2006, 04:04 PM

Search tags for this page

22 rifle loaded from the buttstock
,

22 rifle loads through stock

,
buttstock loading 22 riflr
,

buttstock tube fed winchester .22

,
feed through for rifles
,

marlin 22 auto rifle, loads thru the butt.

,

marlin rifles that load through the buttstock

,
mossberg butt loading 22
,

mossberg buttstock fed

,
old rifle with magazines that feed thru the butt stock
,

rifles that load through the stock

,

stock loading 22 rifle

,
tube maginze in stock
Click on a term to search for related topics.