Thanks...that explains a lot.Nope, haven't seen it.
No....it does not make that claim. Only that a particular type of bullet usually does not.It's based on the premise the Carcano couldn't have produced such a wound, is it not?
Again no....the movie doesn't claim it impossible for that to happen. Other evidence is used to determine why in this case the bullet did not produce the wound on Kennedy. The movie has nothing to do with the type of rifle used other than to explain what it was. It's all about the bullet...not the rifle itselfIt is based heavily on the findings of Donahue, who said the Carcano couldn't have produced such a wound, is it not?
No....the claim is that is the most plausible explanation but go on to say we will really never know for certain.It claims the SS agent shot the president with an AR 15, does it not?
Again....thanks for clearing up the fact you haven't even viewed the movie.